Course Name
|
Turkish |
Planlamada Kantitatif Yönteml
|
| English |
Quantitative Methods in Planning |
Course Code
|
SBP 338 |
Credit |
Lecture
(hour/week) |
Recitation
(hour/week) |
Laboratory
(hour/week) |
| Semester |
-
|
3 |
3 |
- |
- |
| Course Language |
Turkish |
| Course Coordinator |
Mehmet Ali Yüzer
|
| Course Objectives |
Giving information about potential of using numerical methods in planning 2.Increasing ability of students to use mathematical models
3.Teaching numerical methods using process to students
4.Introducing to students with examples that numerical methods are an effective tool in planning process
|
| Course Description |
Numerical methods in planning lesson is to give students setting up problems systematically, providing different aspects to look up these problems, defining relation or relations among problems, using mathematical models in deciding process as a tool to solve these problems
|
| Course Outcomes |
Student, who passed the course satisfactorily can:
1. Quantitative methods and estimating in planning: The estimating techniques devoted to future , advanced planning techniques, modeling and settlement
simulations as planning activities.
2. The use of Information Technologies in planning: Using technology and computers in data collection and assessment process of planning.
3. Research skills: Every stage of planning and design process, gathering data, producing data, usage of analysing techniques, defining problem and synthesizing.
4. Critical Thinking Skills: The ability of multi-perspective analysis on different scale settlements, sensing the spatial assessments from different
perspectives,perception, defining and expressing.
5. Capability of analysing current state and the applications: Considering the current state of the urban area, interpreting the planed-unplanned developments,
considering the spatial organizations whichSystems of settlements in different size and structure: System differences in metropolitan area, metropolis and the cities in
different sizes, structural differences of the cities, the concept and methZoning balance: Balanced distribution of function areas, accessibility and equity for the
common places.
6. Systems of settlements in different size and structure: System differences in metropolitan area, metropolis and the cities in different sizes, structural differences of
the cities, the concept and methZoning balance: Balanced distribution of function areas, accessibility and equity for the common places.
7. Zoning balance: Balanced distribution of function areas, accessibility and equity for the common places.
8. Thinking on alternatives and the scenario development: Considering on the multi-side structure of planning; reducing alternatives bound to scenarios, which have
different system, tool and solutions, anLand use-Transportation systems: The relation systems between functions in the process of planning, different transportation
systems and levels depend on the accessibility between functions for the bigWorking areas: City centers , low level centers, industry areas, service areas and CBD.
9. Land use-Transportation systems: The relation systems between functions in the process of planning, different transportation systems and levels depend on the
accessibility between functions for the bigWorking areas: City centers , low level centers, industry areas, service areas and CBD.
10. Working areas: City centers , low level centers, industry areas, service areas and CBD. |
| Pre-requisite(s) |
|
| Required Facilities |
|
| Other |
|
| Textbook |
Dökmeci, V. (2014), “Planlamada Sayısal Yöntemler”, İTÜ Vakfı Yayınları, İstanbul |
| Other References |
KAYNAKÇA
1. Ackoff, R.L. (1972) Scientific Method: Optimizing Applied Research Decisions New York: John Wiley.
2. Anas, A. (1982). Residential Location Markets and Urban Transportation. New York: Academic Press.
3. Anas, A. (1985). "Dynamic Forecasting of Travel Demand, Residential Location and Land Development, "Papers of the Regional Science Association. 56, 37-58.
4. Anas, A. (1987). The Economics of a Regulated Housing Market: Policy Perspectives and Modeling Methods. New York: John Wiley
5. Aysan, M. (1997) "Industial Decentralization in Istanbul and its impact on transport", Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 123, 3, 40-58.
6. Barr, T. (1984). "TRANUS-J: Putting Large Models into Small Computers." Environment and Planning. B: Planning and Design. 11,87-101.
7. Barra, T. (1989). Integrated Land Use and Transport Modelling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Barnsley, M.F., 1993, Fractals Everywhere, Academic Press Professional, USA
9. Baş A., Yüzer M. A., (2019). Impact of High-speed Railway Systems on Inter-regional Trips and Accessibility in Turkey. AZ ITU Journal, doi: 10.5505/itujfa.2020.17136.
10. Batty, M. (1976). Urban Modelling: Algorithms, Calibrations Predictions. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
11. Batty M., 1997, The Computable City, International Planning Studies 2, 155-173
12. Batty M., Longley P., 1994, Fractal Cities, Academic Press, London
13. Bertuglia, C.S. (1990). Urban Dynamics: Designing an Integrated Model. New York: Routledge.
14. Birkin, M., A.G. Wilson (1986) "Industrial location models: A rewiev and an integrating framework" Environment and Planning A. 18, 175-205
15. Borna S. T., Yüzer M.A., (2020), A Methodology for Estimation of Land Use Changes in an Urban Area with the Emergence of a New Impact Factor, MethodsX 27 July 2020, 101013 PII: S2215-0161(20)30233-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2020.101013 Reference: MEX 101013 Elsevier, Jornals and Books,
16. Bovill C., 1996, Fractal Geometry in Architecture And Design, Boston : Birkhäuser.
17. Boyce, D. ve L. Lundquist (1987). "Network Equilibricem Models of Urban Location and Travel Choices: Alternative Formulations for the Stockholm Region", Papers of the Regional Science Association 61, 93-104.
18. Boyce, D.E. (1986) "Integration of Supply and Demand Models in Transportation and Location: Problem Formulation and Research Questions". Environment and Planning A18. 485-489.
19. Boyce, D.E. (1988). "Renaissance of Large-Scale Models", Papers of The Regional Science Association 65, 1-10.
20. Boyce, D.E. (1990) "Network Equilibrium Models of Urban Location and Travel Choices: New Research Agenda" In New Frontiers in Regional Science (ed.) Manas Chatlerji and R.E. Ruenne. London: Mc Millan Vol. 1, 258-56.eds
21. Brotchie, J.F. (1980) TOPAZ. New York: Springer-Verlag.
22. Churchman, C.W., R.L. Ackoff and E.L. Arnoff (1972) Introduction to Operations Research. New York: John Wiley.
23. Daniere, A.G. (1994) "Estimating Willingness to Pay for Housing Attributes : An Application to Cairo and Mamila", Regional Science and Urban Economics 24, 577-599.
24. Dokmeci, V. (1973), "An Optimization Model for a hierarchical spatial system", Journal of Regional Science, 13,439-451.
25. Dokmeci, V. (1977) "A quantitative model to plan regional health facilities," Management Science. 24,411-19.
26. Dokmeci, V. (1979), "A multi-objective model for regional planning of health facilities," Environment and Planning A., 11,517-25.
27. Dokmeci, V. (1994), "Istanbul Health Facility System for the Year 2000" New World Health 1994, 53-57.
28. Dokmeci, V. ve Cagdas, G. (1993). "Multiobjective Land-use Planning Model", Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 119, 1, 285-89.
29. Dokmeci, V. ve Korea, P. (1992), "Planning Istanbul's Public Library System," Int. Information and Library Review 24, 285-89.
30. Dubin, R.A. and Sung, C.H. (1987) "Spatial Variation in the Price of Housing : Rent Gradient in Non-Monocentric Cities, "Urban Studies, 24, 205-216.
31. Echenique, M.H. (1990). "The MEPLAN Models of Bilboa, Leeds and Dortmund", Transport Reviews 10, 309-22.
32. Egdemir, G. (2001) "Istanbul'da Konut Fiyatlarmin Mekansal Analizi", Doktora Tezi, ITU, Fen Bilimleri Enstitiisii.
33. Fabrycky, W.J. and P.E. Torgersen (1974) Operations Economy: Industrial Applications of Operations Research. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall.
34. Feynman R.P., 2000, Chaos Theory and Fractal Phenomena, http://iglobal.net/pub/camelot/chaos/chaos.html
35. Frankhauser, P., 1992, Fractal Properties of Settlement Structures, FISSM, Montpellier, France
36. Foot, D. (1981) Operational Urban Models, London: Methuen.
37. Forrester, J.W. (1969) Urban Dynamics , Cambridge: MIT Press.
38. Goldner, W. (1971) "The Lowry Model Heritage," Journal of The American Institute of Planners 37, 100-110.
39. Freund, J.E. (2001) Matematiksel istatistik, (£eviren: U. Senesen), Istanbul: Literatur
40. Huh, S. and Kwak, S.J. (1997) "The Choice of Functional Form and Variables in the Hedonic Price Model in Seoul", Urban Studies. 34, 7, 989-998.
41. Jones,D.F., Mirrazavi, S.K., Tamiz, M. (2002) "Multi-objective Meta-heuristic: An Overview of the Current State-of-the -art," European Journal of Operational Research 137, 1-9.
42. Jud, G.D. (1980) "The Effects of Zoning on Single-Family Residential Propertiy Values: Charlotte, North Carolina, Land Economics. 56, 2, 142-154.
43. Kain, J. F. (1987). "Computer Simulation Models of Urban Location", in Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics Vol.11, (ed.) Ei.S. Mills, Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishers, 847-75.
44. Kain, J.F. ve W.C. Apgar (1985) Housing and Neighborhood Dynamics: A Simulation Study. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
45. Kawashima, T. (1985) "Roxy Index: An Indicative Instrument to Measure the Speed of Spatial Concentration and Deconcentration of Population", Regional Science and Urban Economics. 22, 2, 183-213.
46. Kim, T.J. (1989). Integrated Urban Systems Modeling: Theory and Applications, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
47. Klosterman R.E, 1990, Community Analysis and Planning Techniques, Rowman & Littlefield Publ., USA
48. Krueckeberg, D.A. (1974), Urban Planning Analysis: Methods and Models. New York: John Wiley.
49. Kuru A, Yüzer M.A. (2021). “Urban Growth Prediction With Parcel Based 3D Urban Growth Model (PURGOM)”, MethodsX Volume 8, September 24 2021, Elsevier, Jornals and Book, DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2021.101302 ISSN:2215-0161
50. Landis, J.D. (1992) BASS II:A New Generation of Metropolitan simulation Models. Working Paper 573. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California at Berkeley.
51. Landis, J.D. (1993). CUF Model Simulation: Alternative Futures for the Greater Bay Area Region. Working Paper 592. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California at Berkeley.
52. Lapatra, J.W. (1973), Applying the Systems Approach to Urban Development. New York Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Inc.
53. Li, M.M. and Brown, H.J. (1980) "Micro-Neighbourhood Externalities and Hedonic Housing Prices", Land Economics. 56, 2, 125-141.
54. Lombardo, S.T. ve G.A. Rabino (1984). "Nonlinear Dynamic Models for Spatial Interaction: The Results of Some Empirical Experiments". Papers of the Regional Science Association 55, 83-101.
55. Lowry, I.S. (1964). A Model of Metropolis. RM - 4035-RC. Santa Monica: Rand Comporation.
56. Lundguist, L. (1979) "Models of Stockholm: Policy Perspectives", Sistemi Urbani 3. 91-99.
57. Lundqvist, L. (1989). "A Model System for Metropolitan Energy Studies", in Spatial Energy Analysis (ed.) 2. Lundqvist, Aldershot: Averbury, 245-69.
58. Mackett, R.L. (1990). "The Systematic Application of the LILT Model to Dortmund, Leeds and Tokyo", Transport Reviews 10, 323-38.
59. Mandelbrot B.B., 1982, The Fractal Geometry Of Nature, W.H.Freeman and Company, San Francisco
60. Matko, D., B. Zupancic ve R. Karba (1991). Simulation and Modelling of Continuous Systems: A Case Study Approach, New York: Prentice Hall.
61. Mitchell, R. and C. Rapkin (1954) Urban Traffic: A Function of Land Use , New York: Columbia University Press.
62. Neelamkavil, F. (1987). Computer Simulation and Modelling, New York: John Wiley.
63. Oppenheim, N. (1980) Applied Models in Urban and Regional Analysis, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
64. Oppenheim, N. (1986). "Dynamic Forecasting of Urban Shopping Travel Demand", Transportation Research 20B, 391-402.
65. Paköz M., Yüzer M.A. (2014), Access To Healthcare: A Field Survey In İstanbul. ITU J Faculty Arch. 2014; 11(2): 271-290
66. Pumain, D. (1984). "Dynamics of Spatial Structure in French Urban Agglomerations", Papers of the Regional Science Association, 55, 71-82. 16.
67. Rabiega, W.A., Lin, T.W. and Robinson, L.M. (1984) "The Property Value Impacts of Public Housing Projects in Low and Moderate Density Residential Neighborhoods", Land Economics. 60, 2, 174-179.
68. Reif, B. (1973). Models in Urban and Regional Planning. London: Leonard Hill Books.
69. Shearer, J.L. ve B.T. Kulakowski (1990). Dynamic Modelling and Control of Engineering, Systems, New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
70. Sönmez S., Yüzer M.A, (2021), “Reflections of the Circular Economy on the Planning Process”, Architectural Sciences and Sustainability,Volume 2, Chapter 8, 165-196,İksad Publications-2021, Ankara/Türkiye, ISBN: 978-625-8061-43-7
71. Turel, A. (1979) "A Study of Housing and Residential Location in Ankara", Doktora Tezi, London School of Economics, London.
72. Turel, A. (1981) "Ankara'da Konut Fiyatlarının Mekansal Farkhlasjnasi", ODTU Mimarlik Fakiiltesi Dergisi, 7, 1,97-107.
73. White R., Engelen, G., 1993-a, Cellular Dynamics and GIS: Modelling Spatial Complexity, Geographical Systems 1, Page 237-253.
74. White R., Engelen, G., 1993-b, Fractal Urban Land Use Patterns: A Cellular Automata Approach, Environment and Planning A 25, Page 1175-1199.
75. White R., Engelen, G., 1994, “Urban Systems Dynamics and Cellular Automata: Fractal Structures Between Order and Chaos”. Chaos, Solitons, and Fractals 4, Page 563-583.
76. White R., Engelen G., 1997-a, Cellular Automata as the Basis of Integrated Dynamic Regional Modelling, Environment and Planning B 24, Planning and Desing, Pages 235-246
77. White R., Engelen G., 1997-b, Multi-Scale Spatial Modelling of Self-Organizing Urban Systems, F. And Haken, H. (eds.): Self Organization of Complex Structures: From Individual to Collective Dynamics; Gordon and Brech, Pages 519-353,
78. White R., Engelen, G., Uljee I., 1997, The Use of Constrained Cellular Automata for High-Resolution Modelling of Urban Land-Use Dynamics, Environment and Planning B 24, Page 323-343.
79. Wegener, M. (1985). "The Dortmund Housing Market Model: A Monte Carlo Simulation of a Regional Housing Market:" in Microeconomie Models of Housing Markets, (ed.) Konrad Stahl, New York: Springer- Verlag, 144-91.
80. Wegener, M. (1986). "The Time Scale of Urban Change", in Advances in Urban Systems Modelling (ed) Bruce Hutchinson and Michael Batty, Amsterdam: North Holland, 145-97.
81. Wegener, M. (1987). "Transport and Location in Integrated Spatial Models." In Transportation Planning in a Changing World (ed.) P. Nijkamp and S. Reichman, Aldershot: Gower, 208-25.eds
82. Wegener, M. (1994) "Operational Urban Models: State of the Arts", APA Journal, Winter, 17-29.
83. Wilson, A.G. (1974), Urban and Regional Models in Geography and Planning, New York: John Wiley
84. Yüzer M.A. (2001) Şehirsel Yerleşmelerde Fractal ve Hücresel Otomata Yöntemi İle Gelişme Alanlarının Belirlenmesi, İTÜ Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, İstanbul,
85. Yüzer M.A. (2010), Planlama Sürecinde Sayısal Veri Değerlendirme Modeli (İstanbul Metropoliten Alan Çalışması) I.Ulusal Planlamada Sayısal Yöntemler Sempozyumu, 24-26 Kasım 2010, İTÜ, Taşkışla
86. Zeka E., (2020) Design And Modelling Of Urban Development Areas With Reference To Historical Settlements: Case Of Korça
87. Zeka E., Yüzer M. A., (2019). “A Methodology For Measuring The Form Of Organic Settlement”, MethodsX Volume 6, 2019, Pages 368-376, Elsevier, Jornals and Books |
|
|