Dersin Adı
|
Türkçe |
Transformation of Urban Systems
|
| İngilizce |
Transformation of Urban Systems |
Dersin Kodu
|
SBP 4036E |
Kredi |
Ders
(saat/hafta) |
Uygulama
(saat/hafta) |
Labratuvar
(saat/hafta) |
| Dönem |
8
|
2 |
2 |
- |
- |
| Dersin Dili |
İngilizce |
| Dersin Koordinatörü |
Zeynep Günay
|
| Dersin Amaçları |
Dersin amacı, kentsel gündemi oluşturan politikalara dair eleştirel bir değerlendirilme sunulması yoluyla öğrencileri kentsel mekanın yeniden üretimine dair farklı konu alanları ile tanıştırmaktır. Öğrencileri kentsel mekanın ‘yeniden’ üretiminde etkili olan inisiyatiflerin formülasyonu, uygulaması ve etkileri hakkında eleştirel düşünmeyi teşvik etmek; kentsel mekanın yeniden üretimi sürecinde etkili olan yapısal, bağlamsal ve sosyo-ekonomik yaklaşımları ve dinamikleri, bu farklı yaklaşım ve dinamiklerin birbirleri ile ilişkilerini ve etkilerini irdelemek; Türkiye’de etkili olan kentsel yeniden üretim süreçlerine, araçlarına ve çok boyutlu etkilerine dair farkındalık yaratmak; ve kentsel mekanın değişiminin ve dönüşümünün etkin yönetimi için gerekli stratejik yaklaşım ve müdahale araçları konusunda ortak bir anlayış geliştirmeye yardımcı olmak hedefidir.
The aim of the course is to provide students an opportunity to explore and examine different perspectives on the reproduction of urban space through a critical commentary on the policies and practices that influence contemporary urban agenda. It introduces students the knowledge and ability to stimulate critical thinking about the formulation, implementation and impact of initiatives that are effective in the reproduction of urban space with a focus on ‘re’ (renewal, regeneration, redevelopment), to provide students an opportunity to examine different perspectives and dynamics on the reproduction of urban space through the investigation of structural, contextual and socio-economic facets, implications and their inter-relationship, to provide awareness and facilitate understanding on the diverse processes, instruments and multi-layered implications of reproduction of urban space in Turkey, and to develop a collective understanding of strategic approaches and intervention instruments in the effective management of change in urban space.
|
| Dersin Tanımı |
Ders, kentsel yenileme ve dönüşüm üzerinden kentsel mekanın yeniden üretimini kuram, politika ve pratik üzerinden irdeleyen bir dizi tematik oturumdan oluşmaktadır. Bu kapsamda dersin tematik çerçevesini oluşturan oturum başlıkları: (i) ’Re’ gündemi üzerine: Kentsel mekanın yeniden üretimi, (ii) Kentsel mekanın yeniden üretiminde değişen içerik, (iii) Terk alanlarından olanak mekanlarına: Mekan, yer ve tasarım, (iv) Kentsel ekonomi ve dönüşüm, (v) Kentsel dönüşüm ve toplum, (vi) Kentsel dönüşümün yönetimi, (vii) Türkiye’de kentsel mekanın yeniden üretimi: Kuram, politika, pratik
The course is based on a series of thematic sessions on the ‘re’ agenda and its theoretical and historical context through the exploration of different aspects and perspectives and their inter-relationship: (i) On the ‘re’ agenda: Models in the reproduction of urban space, (ii) Changing context: Evolution of urban ‘re’ framework, (iii) From brownfields to opportunity spaces: Space, place and design, (iv) Environmental responsibility, sustainability and resilience, (v) Urban economy and regeneration, (vi) Resolving community realm in urban regeneration, (vii) Managing and delivering urban regeneration, (viii) Urban ‘renewal’ in Turkey: The policy and practice
|
| Dersin Çıktıları |
Dersi tamamlayan öğrenciler:
(i) Kentlerin yeniden üretimine ve değişimin etkin yönetimine dair stratejik çözümler tasarlayabilmek adına farklı politikaların ve uygulamaların kapsamı, bağlamı, performansı ve etkileri konusunda ortak bir anlayış geliştirme, eleştirel ve analitik olarak değerlendirebilme.
(ii) Kentsel yeniden üretim politikaları ile değişen ekonomik, sosyal ve politik dinamikler arasındaki ilişkiyi kavrar, eleştirel bir bakış açısı geliştirir.
(iii) Türkiye’deki kentsel yeniden üretimin bağlamı, kapsamını ve süreci konusunda geniş bir perspektif kazanarak, müdahale edebilmek için gerekli stratejik ve yaratıcı donanıma sahip olma.
(iv) Kentsel mekanın yeniden üretimi üzerine araştırma tasarımında okuma, analiz etme ve yorumlamada yaratıcı anlatı kurma ve metodolojiler hakkında bilgi sahibi olma ve beceri kazanma.
(v) Değişimin sürdürülebilir yönetimini etkileyen sosyal adalet, kentlilik, kent hakkı, eşitlik, etik gibi farklı değerler konusunda anlayış geliştirme bilgi, beceri ve değerlerini kazanır.
On completion of the course, students will be expected to be able to attain knowledge / skills / values on:
(i) Developing collective understanding and ability to analytically assess the scope, performance and impact of policies and delivery mechanisms to design strategic proposals influencing effective management of change in urban space.
(ii) Demonstrating understanding on the relationship between policies on the reproduction of urban space and changing economic, social and political circumstances.
(iii) Broadening understanding of the scope and process in Turkey that impinge the reproduction of urban space necessary for forging a strategic and creative framework to be able to intervene.
(iv) Acquiring knowledge and developing skills on creative narrative building and methodologies in reading, analysing and interpreting in research design on the reproduction of urban space.
(v) Understanding different values affecting the sustainable management of change including social justice, citizenship, right to the city, equity, ethics, etc. |
| Önkoşullar |
n/A |
| Gereken Olanaklar |
n/A |
| Diğer |
n/A |
| Ders Kitabı |
n/A |
| Diğer Referanslar |
BÖLÜM I ‘RE’ GÜNDEMİ ÜZERİNE
PART I ON THE ‘RE’ AGENDA
Atkinson, R., Bridge, G. (2005). Introduction: The new urban colonialism. In R. Atkinson, G. Bridge (Eds), Gentrification in a Global Context: The New Urban Colonialism. London: Routledge.
Brenner, N., Theodore, N. (Eds.) (2002). Spaces of Neoliberalism: Urban Re-structuring in North America and Western Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.
Cochrane, A. (2007). Understanding Urban Policy: A Critical Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Colquhoun, I. (1995). Urban Regeneration. An International Perspective. London: B.T. Batsford Ltd.
Couch, C. (1990). Urban Renewal: Theory and Practice. London: Macmillan Education Ltd.
Couch, C., Fraser, C., Percy, S. (2003) (Eds). Urban Regeneration in Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.
Fainstein, S.S. (1983). Restructuring The City: The Political Economy of Urban Redevelopment. London, NY: Longman.
Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel Cities. London: Verso.
Leary, M. E., McCarthy, J (Eds) (2013). The Routledge Companion to Urban Regeneration. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
Lovering, J. (2007). The relationship between urban regeneration and neoliberalism: Two presumptuous theories and a research agenda. International Planning Studies 12 (4), 343-366.
Lovering, J. (2009). The recession and the end of planning as we have known it. International Planning Studies 14 (1), 1-6.
Roberts, P., Sykes, H. (2000). Urban Regeneration A Handbook. London: Sage Publications.
Roberts, P., Sykes, H., Granger, R. (2017). Urban Regeneration. 2nd Edition. London: Sage Publications.
Smith, N. (1996). The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. London: Routledge.
BÖLÜM II FARKLI PERSPEKTİFLER VE ETKİLERİ
PART II DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS
Atkinson, R., Bridge, G. (2005). Gentrification in a Global Context: The New Urban Colonialism. London: Routledge.
Avila, E., Rose, M.H. (2009). Race, culture, politics and urban renewal. Journal of Urban History, 35 (3), 335-347.
Beer, A., Haughton, G., Maude, A. (Eds) (2003). Developing Locally: An International Comparison of Local and Regional Economic Development. Bristol: The Policy Press. [ch 1].
Davis, M. (2006). Planet of Slums. London: Verso.
DeFillippis, J. (2001). The myth of social capital in community development. Housing Policy Debate 12 (4), p. 781-806.
De Sousa, C. (2008). Brownfields Redevelopment and the Quest for Sustainability. Emerald.
Forrest, R., Kearns, A. (2001). Social cohesion, social capital and the neighbourhood. Urban Studies 38 (12), 2125-2143.
Haider, D. (1992). Place wars: new realities in the 1990s. Economic Development Quarterly 6 (2), 127-134.
Lees, L., Shin, H. B., López-Morales, E. (2016). Planetary Gentrification. Polity Press.
Logan, J.R., Molotch, H. (1987). Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Madanipour, A., Kneirbein, S., Degros, A. (2014). Public Space and the Challenges of Urban Transformation in Europe. New York: Routledge.
Putnam, R.D. (1998). Foreword to special issue on social capital: Its importance to housing and community development. Housing Policy Debate 9 (1), v- viii.
Ratcliffe, P. (1992). Renewal, regeneration and 'race': Issues in urban policy. New Community, 18 (3), 387-400.
Smith, N. (1996). The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. London: Routledge.
Smith, N. (2002). New globalism, new urbanizm: Gentrification as global urban strategy. Antipode 34 (3), 434-57.
Tiesdell, S., Oc, T., Heath, T. (1996). Revitalizing Historic Urban Quarters. Oxford: Architectural Press.
Turkington, R., Watson, C. (Eds) (2015). Renewing Europe’s Housing. Bristol: Policy Press.
Turok, I. (1992). Property-led urban regeneration: panacea or placebo? Environment and Planning A, 24, 361-374.
Weber, R. (2002). Extracting value from the city: neoliberalism and urban redevelopment. Antipode 34 (3), 519–541.
BÖLÜM III DEĞİŞİMİN YÖNETİMİ: STRATEJİK YAKLAŞIMLAR VE SUNUM MEKANİZMALARI
PART III MANAGEMENT OF CHANGE: STRATEGIC APPROACHES & DELIVERY MECHANISMS
Baeten, G. (2000). From community planning to partnership planning: Urban regeneration and shifting power geometries on the South Bank, London. GeoJournal, 51 (4), 293-300.
Brenner, N., Marcuse, P., Mayer, M. (Eds) (2011). Cities for People, Not for Profit: Critical Urban Theory and the Right to the City. London: Routledge.
Harvey, D. (2008) Right to the City. New Left Review 53, 23-40.
Healey, P. (1999). Urban Life, Relational Resources and Collaborative Governance. In Nystrom, L. (Ed), City And Culture: Cultural Processes and Urban Sustainability. 292-305. Lenanders Tryckeri AB, Kalmar.
Imrie, R., Raco, M. (2003). Community and the changing nature of urban policy. In R. Imrie, M. Raco (Eds), Urban Renaissance?: New Labour, Community and Urban Policy. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Lichfield, D. (2000). Organisation and Management. In P. Roberts, H. Sykes (Eds), Urban Regeneration: A Handbook. London: Sage.
Purcell, M. (2003). Citizenship and the right to the global city: reimagining the capitalist world order. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 27 (3), 564-590.
BÖLÜM IV ISTANBUL’UN DEĞİŞİM TOPOĞRAFYASI
PART IV ISTANBUL’S TOPOGRAPHY OF CHANGE
Günay, Z. (2015). Renewal agenda in Istanbul: Urbanisation vs. urbicide. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning 3 (1), 95-108.
Günay, Z. (2018). A critical appraisal on Turkey’s neoliberal quest of urban renewal in historic urban landscapes. J.H. Kruhl, R. Adhikari, U.E. Dorka (Ed) Living with the Threat of Earthquakes: Short and Long-Term Management of Earthquake-Related Risks and Damage Prevention in Nepal. 129-142. Cham: Springer International.
Günay, Z., Koramaz, T.K., Özüekren, A.Ş. (2015) From squatter upgrading to large-scale renewal programmes: Housing renewal in Turkey. R. Turkington, C. Watson (Ed) Renewing Europe’s Housing. 215-244. Bristol: Policy Press.
Ek okuma>
Akkar-Ercan, M. (2006). Kentsel dönü?üm üzerine Batı’daki kavramlar, tanımlar, süreçler ve Türkiye. Planlama 2006/2, 29-38.
Ataov, A., Osmay, S. (2007). Türkiye’de kentsel dönüşüme yöntemsel bir yaklaşım. METU Journal of Faculty of Architecture, 24 (2), 57-82.
Bartu-Candan, A., Kolluoğlu, B. (2008). Emerging spaces of neoliberalism: A gated town and a public housing project in Istanbul. New Perspectives on Turkey 39, 5-46.
Bartu-Candan, A., Özbay, C. (2014). Yeni İstanbul Çalışmaları: Sınırlar, Mücadeleler, Açılımlar. Metis.
Çavdar, A., Tan, P. (Eds) (2013). İstanbul: Müstesna Şehrin İstisna Hali. İstanbul: Sel Yayınları.
Çavusoğlu, E., Strutz, J. (2014). We’ll come and demolish your house!”: The role of spatial (re)production in the neoliberal heg-emonic politics of Turkey. In I. Akca, A. Bekmen, B.A. Ozden (Eds), Turkey Reframed: Constituting Neoliberal Hegemony. 141-154. London: Pluto Press.
Eker, G., Günay, Z. (2019). Süreksiz Şehircilik ve Mülteciler: İstanbul’da Kent-Kamp-Kent. TMMOB (Eds), Göç-Mekân-Siyaset: Toplumsal Hareketlilikler ve Planlama. Ankara: TMMOB Şehir Plancıları Odası.
Gough, J., Gundogdu, I. (2009). Class-cleansing in Istanbul’s World City Project. In L. Porter, K. Shaw (Eds), Whose Urban Renaissance? : An International Comparison of Urban Regeneration Strategies. 16-24. NY: Routledge.
Günay, Z. (2010). Conservation vs. regeneration: Case of European Capital of Culture 2010 Istanbul. European Planning Studies 18 (8), 1173- 1186.
Günay, Z. (2015). İstanbul’da neoliberal korumanın sürdürülemezliği üzerine bir tartışma. Mimar.ist (53), 19-24.
Günay, Z. (2016). Temporality and limits to hospitality in the ruins of a world heritage (renewal) site: Suleymaniye in Istanbul Historic Peninsula. Proceedings, 52th ISOCARP Congress: Frontiers of Planning, 180-189, Durban, September 12-16, 2016.
Günay, Z. (2017). Koruma Planlaması. In S.S. Özdemir, B. Özdemir Sarı, N. Uzun (Eds), Kent Planlama: Kavramlar, Konular, Güncel Tartışmalar. 485-506. Ankara: İmge.
Günay, Z., Dökmeci, V. (2012). Culture-led regeneration of Istanbul waterfront: Golden Horn Cultural Valley. Cities 29 (4), 213-222.
Keyder, C. (2005). Globalization and social exclusion in Istanbul. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29 (1), 124-34.
Kızıldere, D., Günay, Z. (2016). Hate gentrification, love the gentrifier: Conservatist resistance in Tophane. RC21: Transagressive City, Research Committee 21 (RC21) on Sociology of Urban and Regional Development of the International Sociological Association, Mexico City, July 21-23, 2016.
Kuyucu, T., Unsal, O. (2010). Urban transformation as state-led property transfer: an analysis of two cases of urban renewal in Istanbul. Urban Studies, 47 (7), 1479-1499.
Lovering, J., Türkmen, H. (2011). Bulldozer neo-liberalism in Istanbul: The state-led construction of property markets, and the displacement of the urban poor. International Planning Studies 16 (1), 73-96.
Öktem B (2006). Neoliberal küreselleşmenin kentlerde inşası: AKP’nin küresel kent söylemi ve İstanbul’un kentsel dönüşüm projeleri. Planlama (2), 53-63.
Şengül, T. (2003). On the trajectory of urbanisation in Turkey: An attempt at periodisation. International Development Planning Review, 25 (2), 153–68.
Şengül, T. (1999). The Turkish earthquake: An end to the “neoliberal state”? Third World Planning Review, 21 (4), iii-viii.
Tanyeli, U. (2017). Yıkarak Yapmak: Anarşist Bir Mimarlık için Altlık. İstanbul: Metis.
Tekeli, I. (2011). Kent, Kentli Hakları, Kentleşme ve Kentsel Dönüşüm. Istanbul: Tarih Vakfi.
Türkün, A. (2014). Mülk, Mahal, İnsan: İstanbul’da Kentsel Dönüşüm. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi.
Ünsal F., Türk S.S. (2014). Legal and Institutional Context of Urban Planning and Urban Renewal in Turkey: Thinking about Istanbul. In Erkut G, Shirazi R (Eds), Dimensions of Urban Re-development. 15-30. Technische Universitat Berlin.
Yalçıntan, M.C., Çavuşoğlu, E. (2009). Kentsel dönüşümü ve kentsel muhalefeti kent hakkı üzerinden düşünmek. Mimarist (33)., 93-102.
Ayrıca yararlanabileceğiniz indeksli dergiler> European Planning Studies, International Journal of Urban and Regional Planning, Cities [City Profiles], Habitat International, Planning Perspectives, Urban Studies, Urban Geography, Antipode, Urban Age, Funambulist, Trialog, LSE Cities, Guardian Story of Cities, Local Economy, Regional Studies.
>>>Her ders kapsamında ek kaynak verilecektir.
See also the journals European Planning Studies, International Journal of Urban and Regional Planning, Cities [City Profiles], Habitat International, Planning Perspectives, Urban Studies, Urban Geography, Antipode, Urban Age, Funambulist, Trialog, LSE Cities, Guardian Story of Cities, Local Economy, Regional Studies.
*** Additional reading will be given in each lecture. |
|
|