Course Information

Course Name	Turkish	Planlamaya Katılım
	English	Participation in Planning
Course Code	SBP 4022E	Credit	Lecture (hour/week)	Recitation (hour/week)	Laboratory (hour/week)
Semester	5	2	1	2	-
Course Language		English
Course Coordinator		İmge Akçakaya Waıte Jr
Course Objectives		1.To explain different models and methods related to public participation in urban planning; 2.To explain public interest and representation concepts; 3.To explain and research importance of public participation; 4.To determine varied aspects of public participation by playing participation games in urban planning process
Course Description		Theories related to democracy and participation. Public interest and the concept of representation. Decision making processes and decision environments. Basic questions related to public participation. Public Participation models. Techniques for participation in planning. Case studies and evaluation of participation practices in planning.
Course Outcomes		Student, who passed the course satisfactorily 1. will be able to understand concept of participation and democracy 2. will be able to understand concept of representation and commonwealth 3. will be able to understand public participation in urban planning process 4. will be able to understand varied aspects of public participation by playingparticipation games in urban planning process. 5. will be able to understand how to solve problems in public participation process 6. will be able to understand how to realized public participation in abroad
Pre-requisite(s)		None
Required Facilities		Computer use for classes, assignments and exams
Other		N/A
Textbook		Creighton J L, 2005, The Public Participation Handbook: Making Better Decisions through Citizen Involvement, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Other References		* Baum H S, 1994, “Community and Consensus: Reality and Fantasy in Planning” Journal of Planning Education and Research, 13, 251-262. * Creighton J L, 2005, “Chapter 6: Techniques for Getting Information to the Public” in The Public Participation Handbook: Making Better Decisions through Citizen Involvement, 89-101, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. * Creighton J L, 2005, “Chapter 7: Techniques for Getting Information from the Public” in The Public Participation Handbook: Making Better Decisions through Citizen Involvement, 102-137, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. * Forester J, 1989, “Chapter 6: Planning in the Face of Conflict: Mediated Negotiation Stategies in Practice” in Planning in the Face of Power, 82-103, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. * Innes J E, & Booher D E, 2004, “Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century” Planning Theory & Practice, 5(4), 419-436. * Poirier Elliott M L, 1999, “Chapter 5: The Role of Facilitators, Mediators, and Other Consensus Building Practitioners” in The Consensus Building Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide to Reaching Agreement, L Susskind, S MmcKearnan & J Thomas-Larmer (Eds), 199-240, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. * Straus D A, 1999, “Chapter 3: Designing a Consensus Building Process Using a Graphic Road Map” in The Consensus Building Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide to Reaching Agreement, L Susskind, S MmcKearnan & J Thomas-Larmer (Eds), 137-168, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. The students will be introduced to several recent online sources during lecture presentations. Also, PDF files of the reading pieces above can be found in the “Class Files (Sınıf Dosyaları)” section of the Ninova course webpage.

Courses

Help

About