Course Name
|
Turkish |
Mimari Proje VI
|
| English |
Architectural Design VI |
Course Code
|
MIM 312 |
Credit |
Lecture
(hour/week) |
Recitation
(hour/week) |
Laboratory
(hour/week) |
| Semester |
-
|
10 |
3 |
5 |
- |
| Course Language |
Turkish |
| Course Coordinator |
Gülçin Pulat Gökmen
|
| Course Objectives |
Discussion of architectural design problems at different scales and levels of detail within the framework of participation, pluralism and social awareness,
? Critical evaluation of urban context, sustainability, energy, economy, advanced structural systems and building technologies in terms of design methods and current architectural theories,
? Development of complex and multifunctional building programs and solution proposals,
? Evaluation of all kinds of general disaster (natural and artificial) scenarios as inputs in the design process,
? Advanced use of representation environments.
|
| Course Description |
The studio aims to explore the theme of topophilia by focusing on the emotional and cultural bonds that individuals and communities establish with certain places. To this end, through the lens of urban articulation and architectural design, how physical environments - specifically a university campus - foster a sense of belonging and attachment in its dynamic environment will be examined. Our primary research area will be the Kırklareli University campus, which offers potential for exploring the interaction between the natural landscape and the built environment. In this process, students are expected to critically engage with the themes of sustainability, community and innovation, and produce design proposals that address the complex, layered realities of space and establish an emotional and functional connection with the space.
|
| Course Outcomes |
A-The achievement of advanced design notions/
B-Data collection, research and representation in complex urban situations/
C-Development of relevant architectural solutions to a situation defined in an inter-disciplinary section through implementation of appropriate design strategies /
D-Coordination of advanced architectural design processes/
E-Research on advanced technology and material potentials in architectural design/
F-Representing the developed design solution/object information as multi-media outcomes. |
| Pre-requisite(s) |
|
| Required Facilities |
|
| Other |
|
| Textbook |
|
| Other References |
Auge, M. (1995). Non-places: Introduction to an Anthropology of Supermodernity (çev. J. Howe). London: Verso.
Berber, Ö. (2011). Yok-Yer, Yersizleşme ve Yersizyurtsuzluk Kavramları Üzerine Bir Sorgulama. İdealkent, (3), 142-157.
Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T. & Tiesdell, S. (2003). Public Places- Urban Spaces, London: Architectural Press.
Ching, Francis D.K. (2003). Mimarlık: Biçim, mekân ve düzen, Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık (NA2760.C46 2002).
Cresswell, T. (2004). Place: A Short Introduction. Malden: MA, Blackwell Pub.
Ellin, N. (200)6. Integral Urbanism, Taylor & Francis.
Emekci, Ş. (2021). Çevreye duyarlı mimarlık arayışında insan ve doğa ile uyumlu yapı üretme süreci. Journal of Architectural Sciences and
Applications, 6(2), 538-554.
Erkilet, A. (2017). Kenti dinlemek: Kültürel miras, kentsel ayrışma ve yoksulluğa dair yazılar. Büyüyenay Yayınları.
Farrelly, L. (2012). Mimarlıkta sunum teknikleri, Literatür yayıncılık (NA2708.F37 2012).
Gehl, J. & Svarre, B. (2013). How to Study Public Life, Island Press, Washington, DC.
Kellert, R., (2005) Building for life: designing and understanding the human-nature connection, Washington, DC : Island Press.
Lang, J. (2005). Urban Design: A Typology of Procedures and Products, London and New York: Routledge.
Lefebvre, H. (1996). The Right to the City, in Kofman, Eleonore; Lebas, Elizabeth, Writings on cities, Cambridge, Massachusetts Wiley-
Blackwell.
Lefebvre, H. (2014). Mekânın Üretimi. (çev. I. Ergüden). Sel Yayınları.
Lefebvre, H., (1991). Production of Space, çev: Donald Nicholson Smith, Blackwell.
Relph, E. (1976). Place and Placelessness. London: Pion.
Tuan, Y. F., (1974). Topophilia: a study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Ujang, N., & Zakariya, K. (2015). The Notion of Place, Place Meaning and Identity in Urban Regeneration. Social and Behavioral Sciences,
170, 709-717.
Whyte, W. (1979). Belgesel Film: ‘Social Life of Small Urban Spaces’, The Street Life Project, Municipal Art Society of New York.
Whyte, W. H. (2001). The social life of small urban spaces, New York: Project for Public Spaces. |
|
|